Planet Psych.

Site Map


Therapist Link
   View the Directory
   Add a Name to the

      Directory

Self Help
   Education
   Relaxation
   Exercise
   Values
   Creativity
   Humor
   Group Support

   Nutrition

Psychology 101
   Disorders

   Treatments
  Treatment Forms
   Topics  
   Glossary

Interactive 
   Depression Test
   Compatibility Quiz
      PlanetPsych

      Newsletter

Bookstore

amazon.gif (1890 bytes)



Advertising Information

 


How Reliable Is Memory?

by Thomas A. Grugle, M.D.



A Dallas County jury recently awarded $350,000 judgment against a Dallas psychiatrist in a case involving alleged recovered memories of sexual abuse. This decision comes just seven months after a California jury made a similar finding against a psychiatrist and awarded $500,000 to a father who claimed he had been slandered by false memories planted by his daughter's therapist. These cases, and others, leave us wondering, are any memories of traumatic events reliable, or must we take everything we think we remember with a shaker of salt?

On one side of the issue is the group claiming memory is completely unreliable and that all therapists who work with survivors of sexual abuse are charlatans trying to ruin innocent reputations. On the other is the group that seems to say that almost everyone was abused as a child, most likely by Satanists, we just haven't all remembered it yet.

Whenever two groups line up as polar opposites, you can bet the truth is somewhere in the middle. The issue of "false memories" is no exception.

We now know a great deal about memory and are learning more every day. Memory is a tricky thing, and can be unreliable. There is no doubt, however, that the process of repression, the forgetting of traumatic events, is a real and provable process.
In a recent study at Harvard Medical School, researchers located adults who were known to have been sexually abused as children. A high number of those now grown up children had no recollection of the abuse in their past. The younger the child was at the time of the abuse, the less likely it was that they would have conscious memories of it as an adult.
This study, and others that will be completed soon, should leave little, if any, room for doubt that the process of repression is a real and verifiable phenomena.

On the other hand, this study does not prove that all or most people with emotional problems were sexually abused as a child. On the contrary, studies that have looked at this question found only a weak association between emotional problems in the present and sexual abuse in the past. In other words, childhood sexual abuse is but one of many ways to become emotionally troubled.

So how can you know if your therapist is helping you recover real memories of abuse, or just leading you to conclusions about yourself and your family that are utterly untrue? Here are a few things to watch for in a psychotherapist that indicate he or she is doing it right:


1. Therapeutic Neutrality: This is an often misunderstood therapeutic skill. All therapists should practice it. Neutrality doesn't mean lack of empathy or caring, but it does mean that your therapist devotes equal interest and attention to everything you bring up or talk about. If your therapist seems especially interested in only one part of you or your thoughts, especially if he or she is enthralled with digging for childhood abuse, you should seek another opinion.

2. No Leading Questions: This is really just a variation of neutrality, but deserves special mention. Almost everything that gets talked about in therapy ought to have come spontaneously from your own thoughts and feelings. Your therapist is there to help you explore what is inside you, not to suggest things you ought to be thinking about or trying to remember.

3. Healthy Skepticism: The process of psychotherapy is fraught with historical inaccuracies. These small distortions of the truth have little effect on the healing power of psychotherapy, but no one should take what is remembered or talked about in the context of psychotherapy as historical truth. How we experienced the past is far more important to the process of psychotherapy than verifying each and every detail.

4. Encourages Ambivalence: Life consists of shades of gray. Almost nothing is absolute, at least here on this planet. Learning to live with uncertainty and mixed feelings is a part of growing up.

5. Holistic View: Who you are and the problems you are having are all a mixture of lots of things, including your genetic makeup, the family you grew up in, your personality and temperament, and a host of other variables. This is the theory of complex causality; nothing is directly caused by only one other thing or event. Life is a whole mix of events, experiences and emotions, all of which influence and change the others. In other words, there is no particular problem or illness that always results from childhood abuse.


A word about truth serum-it is almost never helpful. The only clinical situation that may be an indication for the use of Amytal (truth serum) is when the health or safety of the patient or others depends on a rapid discovery of some forgotten event or detail. When the event forgotten is childhood sexual abuse, there is almost never any urgency to remember. Time and talking will do.

Events or memories spoken while under the influence of Amytal are subject to the same skepticism and need for verification. Being under the influence of a drug does not guarantee truthfulness.

Finally, hypnosis is an oft abused method of treatment and subject to the same limitations described for Amytal. Hypnosis is a proven and effective treatment for a wide variety of emotional and physical problems ranging from burn recovery to weight loss to smoking cessation. When applied by trained and competent hypnotherapist it is almost always safe and effective, but it is not a highway to finding lost memories.

By recognizing the subjective nature of memory, and of life itself, we can avoid the fallacy of believing that all memories are historical facts until proven otherwise. Memories can inform, guide and educate us about ourselves and our emotions, but they cannot reliably prove events in the past.


Copyright 1994 by Thomas A. Grugle, M.D.; Dallas, Texas.   More articles by Dr. Grugle can be found at http://www.cybercouch.com.

 




home.jpg (2512 bytes)

search.jpg (2987 bytes)

top.jpg (2072 bytes)

[ Home ]     [Therapist Link]     [ Self Help ]    [ Psychology 101 ]      [ Interactive ]     [Bookstore]
Send mail to the [email protected] with questions or comments about this web site.

All information contained in this site is intended for educational and entertainment purposes only. No claims are made to offer diagnosis or treatment of any condition. If diagnosis or treatment is desired, we recommend that you consult an appropriate professional.  Check the Therapist Directory to find one near you.

Copyright � 1999-2006 PlanetPsych.com